The federal patchwork in the relationship between state and religion is a thorn in the side of the Church of Fortuna. It aims to ensure that this is regulated uniformly across Switzerland in the future. Could the Fortuna association achieve its goal through a popular initiative or through a concordat? How should it proceed concretely, what procedural steps should be observed, and what would be the respective advantages and disadvantages?
March 14, 2025
Administrative Law
The Fortuna Association has two potentially viable avenues to pursue its goal of a uniform regulation of the relationship between state and religion in Switzerland: a popular initiative or a concordat.
### Popular Initiative:
The Fortuna Association could initiate a popular initiative for a partial revision of the Federal Constitution according to Art. 139 of the Federal Constitution (BV). The following procedural steps must be observed:
1. Formulation of the Concern: The popular initiative can either be submitted as a general proposal or as a developed draft (Art. 139 para. 2 BV). 2. Collection of Signatures: The Fortuna Association needs the support of 100,000 eligible voters, which must be collected within 18 months (Art. 139 para. 1 BV). 3. Verification of Validity: The initiative must not violate the unity of form and content as well as mandatory provisions of international law (Art. 139 para. 3 BV). 4. Processing by the Federal Assembly: If the initiative is submitted as a general proposal and is rejected by the Federal Assembly, it will still be submitted to the people for a vote. For a developed draft, the initiative is submitted directly to the people and the cantons for a vote, with the Federal Assembly providing a recommendation for acceptance or rejection of the initiative and possibly creating a counter-draft (Art. 139 para. 4 and 5 BV; Art. 194 para. 1-3 BV). Advantages:
- Direct involvement of the population.
- Broad discussion and awareness of the topic.
Disadvantages:
- Long and complicated procedure.
- Possibility of rejection by the Federal Assembly or the people.
### Concordat:
The Fortuna Association could also seek to establish a concordat. According to Art. 48 BV, cantons can enter into contracts with each other and create joint organizations and institutions. However, these contracts must not conflict with the interests of the Confederation and the rights of other cantons and must be submitted to the Confederation for acknowledgment (Art. 48 para. 3 BV).
Procedural Steps: 1. Negotiations with the Cantons: Collaboration and negotiations with the individual cantons to reach a common agreement. 2. Drafting an Inter-Cantonal Contract: Formulation of the concordat that meets the necessary legal requirements and outlines the essential content of the provisions (Art. 48 para. 4 BV). 3. Approval by the Cantons: Consent of the cantonal parliaments. 4. Notification to the Confederation: The concordat must be acknowledged by the Confederation. Advantages:
- Only the affected cantons need to agree, not the entire population.
- Opportunity to treat the topic in a more specialized and regionally adapted manner.
Disadvantages:
- Different interests of the cantons can lead to lengthy negotiations.
- Risk of inconsistency due to participating and non-participating cantons.
Both methods have their own advantages and disadvantages, and the Fortuna Association must weigh which approach is more suitable to achieve the desired goal.
Sources